Safety Programs
Development
Management
Supervision
Assistance

Regulatory Compliance
Training
Onsite inspections
Audits
Compliance qualification
Fine/citation representation
HAZMAT transportation
Clean-up assistance

Safety Audits/Inspections
Plants, facilities, offices
Offshore and onshore
Drilling operations
Production units
Fleet/transportation
Safety mgmt. systems
Geophysical land/marine seismic operations
Marine facilities, platforms, vessels

Safety Assistance
Onsite HSE representation
Accident investigations
Root cause analysis
USDOT supervisor drug and alcohol awareness training
Air, noise, norm and confined space entry surveys


  
 

Proforma Safety, LLC

Proforma PSI…when performance counts.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): an observational study
SOS-KANTO study group
The Lancet 2007; 369:920-926

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60451-6

Summary
Background
Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is a barrier to bystanders doing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but few clinical studies have investigated the efficacy of bystander resuscitation by chest compressions without mouth-to-mouth ventilation (cardiac-only resuscitation).

Methods
We did a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. On arrival at the scene, paramedics assessed the technique of bystander resuscitation. The primary endpoint was favourable neurological outcome 30 days after cardiac arrest.

Findings
4068 adult patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest witnessed by bystanders were included; 439 (11%) received cardiac-only resuscitation from bystanders, 712 (18%) conventional CPR, and 2917 (72%) received no bystander CPR. Any resuscitation attempt was associated with a higher proportion having favourable neurological outcomes than no resuscitation (5·0% vs 2·2%, p<0·0001). Cardiac-only resuscitation resulted in a higher proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes than conventional CPR in patients with apnoea (6·2% vs 3·1%; p=0·0195), with shockable rhythm (19·4% vs 11·2%, p=0·041), and with resuscitation that started within 4 min of arrest (10·1% vs 5·1%, p=0·0221). However, there was no evidence for any benefit from the addition of mouth-to-mouth ventilation in any subgroup. The adjusted odds ratio for a favourable neurological outcome after cardiac-only resuscitation was 2·2 (95% CI 1·2–4·2) in patients who received any resuscitation from bystanders.

Interpretation
Cardiac-only resuscitation by bystanders is the preferable approach to resuscitation for adult patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, especially those with apnoea, shockable rhythm, or short periods of untreated arrest.

The full study is available on The Lancet here. You will be required to go through a FREE subscription process.


© Copyright Proforma Safety 2006